What’s Missing From Your Process?
One of my favorite Disney+ shows is Loki. It’s a truly fascinating look at time travel, predetermined events, and controlling your own destiny.
And now I’m going to give you a major (if not very simplified) spoiler, if you haven’t seen it.
In the finale, Loki masters the ability to “time slip,” or transport to any time, any place, in any timeline (for all intents and purposes, a timeline is a parallel universe). This also allows him to relive events over and over again.
So as all of existence faces eradication, he can take as much “time” as he wants to learn how to save everything and everyone, on every timeline.
He continuously, over thousands of years, learns everything he needs to learn, and practices, through trial and error, to improve his process, and his odds of saving everything and everyone.
And while we don’t have thousands of years, or the ability to time travel, we do have the ability to take a step back and consider the question, “What’s missing?”
Read the full article here
Sponsored by Liquid Web
————
Streamlined Solopreneur is the podcast for solopreneurs who want to automate their business and take time off worry-free. Each week, Joe Casabona shares practical systems, tools, and strategies to help you reclaim your time and run your business without sacrificing your the rest of your life, or your health.
Start with the free Solopreneur Sweep — a step-by-step method for finding where your business is losing time: https://streamlined.fm/sweep
If this episode helped you, leaving a review on Apple Podcasts helps other solopreneurs find the show — it only takes a minute and means a lot.
Connect with Joe on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jcasabona/
Transcript
Joe: One of my favorite Disney plus shows is Loki.
00:00:03.840 –> 00:00:08.970
It's a truly fascinating look at time travel, predetermined events,
00:00:09.000 –> 00:00:11.010
and controlling your own destiny.
00:00:12.120 –> 00:00:15.870
And now I'm going to give you a major, if not very simplified
00:00:15.875 –> 00:00:18.150
spoiler if you haven't seen it.
00:00:19.185 –> 00:00:25.785
See in the finale Loki Masters, the ability to time, slip or transport to
00:00:25.785 –> 00:00:28.995
any time, any place, and in any timeline.
00:00:30.015 –> 00:00:33.855
For all intents and purposes, a timeline is a parallel universe.
00:00:34.155 –> 00:00:40.425
If you're not familiar with the multiverse in Marvel, this also allows him to
00:00:40.425 –> 00:00:43.394
relive events over and over again.
00:00:44.670 –> 00:00:51.480
So as all of existence faces eradication, he can take as much quote unquote time
00:00:51.810 –> 00:00:58.860
as he wants to learn how to save all of everything and everyone on every timeline.
00:00:59.910 –> 00:01:05.340
He continuously over thousands of years, learns everything he needs
00:01:05.340 –> 00:01:11.610
to learn and practices through trial and error to improve his process.
00:01:11.970 –> 00:01:17.550
And his odds of saving everything and everyone, and while we don't
00:01:17.550 –> 00:01:22.830
have thousands of years or the ability to time travel, we do have
00:01:22.830 –> 00:01:28.920
the ability to take a step back and consider the question what's missing.
00:01:29.850 –> 00:01:30.750
Hey everybody.
00:01:30.780 –> 00:01:32.070
Joe Casabona here.
00:01:32.070 –> 00:01:39.420
This is episode 4 0 4 of how I built it, and I'm going to ask you the question.
00:01:40.200 –> 00:01:42.149
What's missing from your process?
00:01:42.600 –> 00:01:46.320
You can find all of the show notes for this episode and you can join
00:01:46.320 –> 00:01:51.929
my mailing list over at How I Built It slash 4 0 4 for members.
00:01:51.929 –> 00:01:55.800
I'm going to be talking about thinking about my own production toolkit and
00:01:55.804 –> 00:02:02.759
process, and wonder if it's time to ditch D script for my recording and editing.
00:02:03.330 –> 00:02:06.900
If you want to become a member, you can click the link in the description.
00:02:07.215 –> 00:02:11.535
Or you can find that link over@howibuilt.it slash 4 0 4,
00:02:12.045 –> 00:02:15.674
but for now, let's get to the intro and then the episode.
00:02:20.725 –> 00:02:25.105
hey everybody, and welcome to How I Built It, the podcast that helps
00:02:25.105 –> 00:02:29.515
busy solopreneurs and creators grow their business without
00:02:29.519 –> 00:02:31.195
spending too much time on it.
00:02:31.734 –> 00:02:37.045
I'm your host, Joe Casabona, and each week I bring you interviews and case studies
00:02:37.195 –> 00:02:41.594
on how to build a better business through smarter processes, time management.
00:02:41.795 –> 00:02:43.894
And effective content creation.
00:02:44.255 –> 00:02:48.424
It's like getting free coaching calls from successful solopreneurs.
00:02:49.054 –> 00:02:53.375
By the end of each episode, you'll have one to three takeaways you can
00:02:53.375 –> 00:02:58.984
implement today to stop spending time in your business and more time on
00:02:58.984 –> 00:03:04.084
your business or with your friends, your family reading, or however
00:03:04.084 –> 00:03:06.904
you choose to spend your free time.
00:03:07.156 –> 00:03:13.636
Okay, so back in November I asked this question of my members, when do
00:03:13.636 –> 00:03:15.886
you burn it all down and start over.
00:03:17.056 –> 00:03:21.106
In the members portion of this, I discuss my current and future tool set for
00:03:21.111 –> 00:03:22.786
recording, editing and transcription.
00:03:22.786 –> 00:03:22.816
I.
00:03:23.281 –> 00:03:27.451
And I can't help but wonder if I'm just a chronic app switcher
00:03:27.691 –> 00:03:32.521
I am, or if I'm looking to legitimately improve my processes.
00:03:33.451 –> 00:03:35.431
Here's what I said back in November.
00:03:36.481 –> 00:03:39.271
So when do you burn it all down and start over?
00:03:40.081 –> 00:03:43.891
I think it's when the frustrations start getting in the way of you
00:03:43.891 –> 00:03:50.311
working efficiently if what you have is working and you can continue
00:03:50.311 –> 00:03:52.201
to afford the tools you use.
00:03:52.546 –> 00:03:53.446
Leave them be.
00:03:54.346 –> 00:04:00.586
But if your processes suddenly start fighting you or there's a consolidation
00:04:00.591 –> 00:04:05.776
of tools like with DS script and squad cast, you should consider changing.
00:04:07.306 –> 00:04:11.686
So that's again what I said back in November, but that's not the whole story.
00:04:11.746 –> 00:04:14.206
That's the burn it all down story.
00:04:15.106 –> 00:04:17.806
Reviewing your process is a bit different.
00:04:18.646 –> 00:04:22.246
It's something that you should do more often than every couple
00:04:22.246 –> 00:04:25.396
of years or so in the show.
00:04:25.396 –> 00:04:26.086
Loki.
00:04:26.626 –> 00:04:32.026
Loki could have continuously gone back to a happier time, relive
00:04:32.026 –> 00:04:34.516
that until it gets bad and go back.
00:04:34.906 –> 00:04:40.906
He was living outside of time as they put it in the show, but he
00:04:40.906 –> 00:04:44.056
was burdened with glorious purpose.
00:04:44.236 –> 00:04:50.206
Loki: I am Loki of Asgard, and I am burdened with glorious purpose.
00:04:50.641 –> 00:04:57.511
Joe: In Groundhog Day, bill Murray's character, Phil Connors, which by
00:04:57.511 –> 00:05:02.731
the way, I just realized, uh, that that's like an homage to p Phil.
00:05:02.731 –> 00:05:08.101
And then I am assuming John Connors from, uh, from Terminator.
00:05:08.671 –> 00:05:13.111
Anyway, in Groundhogs Day, bill Murray's character, Phil Connors is stuck
00:05:13.141 –> 00:05:18.121
on the same day and after realizing selfishness and hedonism isn't the way.
00:05:18.376 –> 00:05:26.536
He uses the time to improve himself until spoiler alert, he breaks the cycle.
00:05:27.646 –> 00:05:32.776
In both instances, the characters took a step back, looked at what needs to
00:05:32.781 –> 00:05:35.746
be fixed and solved their problems.
00:05:36.746 –> 00:05:41.681
So let's talk about reviewing your processes, but first, let's take
00:05:41.761 –> 00:05:44.216
a break to hear from our sponsors.
00:05:45.206 –> 00:05:50.786
Okay, so let's look at reviewing your processes, bringing
00:05:50.786 –> 00:05:52.916
this point back to reality.
00:05:53.036 –> 00:05:58.076
How many times have you ignored something until it got truly painful
00:05:58.076 –> 00:06:02.661
to experience a light bulb that flickers an ache in your foot?
00:06:03.566 –> 00:06:08.606
Having to comb through your email to find that contract you sent one time so you can
00:06:08.606 –> 00:06:11.516
make a copy of it to send to a new client.
00:06:12.626 –> 00:06:16.076
It's easy to view these fixes as inconvenient.
00:06:16.706 –> 00:06:22.136
You're taking time away from what you're trying to do after all, but.
00:06:22.496 –> 00:06:28.436
You find that the fix changing, the light bulb, visiting the doctor, saving that
00:06:28.441 –> 00:06:34.826
contract in an easily accessible folder is actually much easier and could end
00:06:34.826 –> 00:06:37.496
up saving you time and or frustration.
00:06:38.846 –> 00:06:42.926
The same thing goes for your work, making a video, writing,
00:06:42.926 –> 00:06:44.396
creating a podcast episode.
00:06:45.101 –> 00:06:49.961
You are so caught up in the actual creating that you don't feel you have
00:06:49.961 –> 00:06:53.111
the time to step back and evaluate.
00:06:53.771 –> 00:07:01.331
Does that sound familiar to any of you, but my friend doing this exact thing?
00:07:01.331 –> 00:07:05.621
Taking a step back and evaluating your process.
00:07:06.251 –> 00:07:13.451
This has the potential to unlock or properly reallocate hours of your time.
00:07:15.236 –> 00:07:16.406
So how do you do it?
00:07:17.606 –> 00:07:20.306
Well, I think that there are two paths.
00:07:21.266 –> 00:07:24.596
The first one is to think about what takes the most time.
00:07:25.466 –> 00:07:30.866
You can ask yourself what takes the most time and eliminate or improve that.
00:07:31.976 –> 00:07:38.036
For example, when I first started this podcast, I would edit each episode,
00:07:38.816 –> 00:07:42.536
but I quickly realized that this was the longest part of the process.
00:07:42.851 –> 00:07:47.231
I wasn't particularly good at it, which is also something I hear
00:07:47.231 –> 00:07:49.001
from my clients and students.
00:07:49.001 –> 00:07:52.061
Editing easily takes the most time.
00:07:53.411 –> 00:07:56.411
So I decided to hire an editor.
00:07:57.821 –> 00:08:01.211
He does for about 50 bucks an episode.
00:08:01.721 –> 00:08:06.431
What would usually take me one to two hours per episode.
00:08:07.331 –> 00:08:11.561
So not only was I eating up a lot of my time.
00:08:12.176 –> 00:08:16.976
But in terms of billable hours, I was losing hundreds of dollars per episode.
00:08:18.716 –> 00:08:25.316
If there is a bottleneck in your process, that's a great place to start improving.
00:08:25.826 –> 00:08:30.116
If you do something and it's just eating up your time, and especially
00:08:30.116 –> 00:08:35.516
if you don't like doing it, it is a prime area for improvement.
00:08:36.811 –> 00:08:40.921
The other thing that you can do is think about the lowest effort improvement.
00:08:41.941 –> 00:08:45.691
Perhaps the improvement that would take the most time would also take a high level
00:08:45.691 –> 00:08:51.091
of effort to fix, or would cost funds or cost money that you don't have yet.
00:08:52.051 –> 00:08:57.061
So conversely, you could consider the easiest thing to improve and do that.
00:08:58.051 –> 00:09:03.481
A great example of this in podcasting is using a scheduler to book your guests.
00:09:03.856 –> 00:09:10.346
Instead of figuring out a time via email, the scheduler is easy to implement,
00:09:10.406 –> 00:09:16.616
free to start, and saves a ton of time and confusion getting guests booked.
00:09:17.276 –> 00:09:21.686
I've gone back and forth over multiple days getting a time set.
00:09:22.511 –> 00:09:25.301
There's the whole what works for you.
00:09:25.391 –> 00:09:28.361
Dance, because you don't have direct access to their schedule.
00:09:28.571 –> 00:09:30.191
You have the time zone dance.
00:09:30.191 –> 00:09:30.911
Where are they?
00:09:30.916 –> 00:09:32.951
Are we close to daylight savings time?
00:09:33.161 –> 00:09:34.631
Are they in Arizona?
00:09:34.871 –> 00:09:37.781
Arizona has its own rules for daylight savings time.
00:09:37.991 –> 00:09:43.006
No one knows what time it is in Arizona in November, no
00:09:43.006 –> 00:09:45.586
more because I use a scheduler.
00:09:46.696 –> 00:09:51.286
And the great thing about this approach is because you're looking at low effort
00:09:51.286 –> 00:09:54.256
improvements, it allows for quick wins.
00:09:54.261 –> 00:09:59.086
Without monumental process shifts, you can make a change here and a change there.
00:09:59.091 –> 00:10:01.726
And over time those will compound.
00:10:03.601 –> 00:10:07.621
Now, I know I said that there were two ways, but there's actually another way
00:10:07.621 –> 00:10:10.021
to think about improving your process.
00:10:10.351 –> 00:10:15.931
And I suspect that the cold open and the title of this episode
00:10:16.261 –> 00:10:17.911
betrayed what I'm about to say.
00:10:18.721 –> 00:10:21.661
Uh, it's to ask what's missing?
00:10:22.741 –> 00:10:28.051
This is the most open-ended question, and it could yield a bunch of answers.
00:10:28.966 –> 00:10:33.586
You could find what's missing is an extra step that makes your content more popular.
00:10:34.066 –> 00:10:38.596
For example, I started publishing my articles on Substack as well as
00:10:38.596 –> 00:10:42.316
my personal blog this year because I have a suspicion that thanks
00:10:42.321 –> 00:10:46.426
to Substack Discovery Engine, more people will find my work.
00:10:47.956 –> 00:10:52.276
You could also find what's missing is an automated reminder to follow up with leads
00:10:52.276 –> 00:10:54.196
so they don't fall through the cracks.
00:10:54.871 –> 00:10:58.861
Around the holidays, I forgot to follow up with certain people because
00:10:58.861 –> 00:11:04.591
I moved systems and I realized that I was missing those reminders, and so I
00:11:04.591 –> 00:11:08.521
fixed that and now I know exactly what I need to follow up with everybody.
00:11:09.811 –> 00:11:13.021
Maybe what's missing is an assistant or a coach.
00:11:14.446 –> 00:11:18.961
When I'm looking to improve my process, I like to start with
00:11:18.961 –> 00:11:20.096
the question, what's missing?
00:11:21.331 –> 00:11:25.891
It allows me and my coaching client, who I do this exercise with as well,
00:11:26.251 –> 00:11:30.931
to think bigger picture about the overall process, moving through
00:11:30.931 –> 00:11:34.801
each step and wondering if there's something better that we can do here.
00:11:35.701 –> 00:11:39.901
Usually when I sit down with a coaching client for the first time, I ask them
00:11:40.171 –> 00:11:43.051
to tell me everything that they do.
00:11:43.771 –> 00:11:47.941
When they publish a single episode of their podcast, they go through it and
00:11:47.941 –> 00:11:49.621
they say, okay, but what's missing?
00:11:50.551 –> 00:11:52.861
What do you do before you book the guest?
00:11:53.401 –> 00:11:56.191
What do you do after you edit the episode?
00:11:57.151 –> 00:11:59.491
What's missing from the process that you just told me?
00:12:00.121 –> 00:12:05.131
And we usually end up with a much longer list than they anticipated and plenty
00:12:05.131 –> 00:12:07.201
of places where we can save them time.
00:12:08.301 –> 00:12:11.631
Here's an example of me doing this exercise recently
00:12:11.631 –> 00:12:13.161
with these solo episodes.
00:12:14.766 –> 00:12:18.546
The original process was to make an outline, record some thoughts
00:12:18.546 –> 00:12:23.586
in D script, make some light edits for content, and then publish.
00:12:24.636 –> 00:12:29.376
So as I approached this process, I asked what's missing, and here are
00:12:29.376 –> 00:12:30.847
some of the answers I came up with.
00:12:31.666 –> 00:12:33.346
There's not a clear story.
00:12:33.351 –> 00:12:34.006
I'm telling.
00:12:35.111 –> 00:12:40.516
These episodes aren't as polished as my interviews, which are edited more
00:12:40.516 –> 00:12:42.856
for both audio quality and content.
00:12:44.341 –> 00:12:52.171
And there's not a clear show document or notes for my VA to use to upload
00:12:52.231 –> 00:12:57.961
the episode to Transistor because I'm usually just doing this based
00:12:57.961 –> 00:12:59.881
on an outline that I created.
00:12:59.881 –> 00:13:05.011
I'm not creating the full document, and so usually she ends up asking me what to do.
00:13:05.741 –> 00:13:11.621
I realized that I was spending all of my time on doing basic edits because I
00:13:11.621 –> 00:13:16.751
didn't have a clearly defined thought progression every time I recorded.
00:13:17.471 –> 00:13:22.301
I would just have an outline, so I would talk a little bit, get off track, ramble,
00:13:22.301 –> 00:13:24.251
then make an edit point to edit that out.
00:13:25.391 –> 00:13:30.131
Then like I said, when my VA went to upload those episodes, she never knew
00:13:30.191 –> 00:13:34.421
what to write in the description box because I didn't provide anything for
00:13:34.426 –> 00:13:36.851
her because I just recorded the episode.
00:13:38.081 –> 00:13:44.651
These were big problems in my workflow because I thought solo episodes.
00:13:44.966 –> 00:13:50.126
We're going to be easier than interviews, and I should say that there are big
00:13:50.126 –> 00:13:54.206
problems in my workflow because I didn't take the time to define the process
00:13:54.716 –> 00:13:58.886
because I thought that they were going to be easier than interviews, and they are.
00:13:59.276 –> 00:14:02.546
I mean, but I'm still trying to produce good content here,
00:14:03.656 –> 00:14:05.786
so how do I fix these problems?
00:14:06.566 –> 00:14:09.896
Well, through this exercise, I found that the main issue
00:14:09.896 –> 00:14:11.966
was the lack of a clear story.
00:14:12.671 –> 00:14:16.541
I've been talking for at least the last six months about the
00:14:16.541 –> 00:14:21.101
importance of good storytelling in podcasting, how storytelling
00:14:21.311 –> 00:14:26.711
is going to help you differentiate from every podcast out there.
00:14:28.151 –> 00:14:33.281
And I wasn't doing a good job of that on my own podcast, so I knew I could
00:14:33.281 –> 00:14:38.531
kill two birds by adding a script, which in turn becomes articles that
00:14:38.621 –> 00:14:41.291
you read on my blog or on Substack.
00:14:42.306 –> 00:14:49.106
The script allows me to hash out my ideas and formulate a good three act story
00:14:49.106 –> 00:14:55.706
with a hopefully gripping open, uh, that got your attention, but it also gives
00:14:55.706 –> 00:15:02.066
me clear copy for my VA to add to the description, I usually just copy and paste
00:15:02.066 –> 00:15:04.526
the text that is serving as the cold open.
00:15:06.551 –> 00:15:10.301
I also made the decision to send solo episodes to my editor.
00:15:11.051 –> 00:15:15.581
He can edit for content and polish up the audio better than ica.
00:15:17.051 –> 00:15:18.731
By asking what's missing.
00:15:19.361 –> 00:15:23.381
I was able to make several improvements to these solo shows.
00:15:24.401 –> 00:15:30.461
So to wrap up, I want to point out something that you may have realized.
00:15:31.436 –> 00:15:36.596
It doesn't seem like I'm saving time by swapping the edit for writing a script.
00:15:38.066 –> 00:15:42.386
And you're right, it may not always be true that you're saving
00:15:43.076 –> 00:15:48.566
a bunch of time by improving your process, but as I talked about in
00:15:48.571 –> 00:15:50.996
my piece, great things require time.
00:15:51.776 –> 00:15:57.476
It's about taking the right shortcuts or saving time in the right places.
00:15:57.986 –> 00:16:03.986
So that you can focus on the really important bits, in my opinion, swapping
00:16:03.986 –> 00:16:08.966
the edit for scripts or for writing scripts creates much better content
00:16:09.686 –> 00:16:14.186
and early indications on my podcast stats show that you think so too.
00:16:15.326 –> 00:16:18.116
Plus, I usually write an article for my blog and newsletter.
00:16:18.116 –> 00:16:22.406
Anyway, some minor tweaks, and that content now serves three purposes,
00:16:22.796 –> 00:16:24.536
which ultimately does save time.
00:16:25.631 –> 00:16:26.771
That's not really the point, right.
00:16:26.771 –> 00:16:32.674
I swapped out editing for script writing when both Loki and Phil from
00:16:32.679 –> 00:16:35.734
Groundhog Day had a problem to solve.
00:16:36.064 –> 00:16:38.764
They weren't trying to save themselves time.
00:16:39.694 –> 00:16:45.309
They were trying to leverage the time they knew they had and make the most of it.
00:16:46.969 –> 00:16:49.459
That's what a good process does for you.
00:16:50.449 –> 00:16:55.309
It allows you to use your time wisely so you can do your best work.
00:16:56.569 –> 00:17:00.679
That's what you can gain from asking what's missing.
00:17:02.449 –> 00:17:06.049
Thanks so much for listening to this episode of How I Built It.
00:17:06.379 –> 00:17:11.569
You can find the article for this episode as well as the ability to join
00:17:11.569 –> 00:17:13.249
my mailing list or the membership.
00:17:13.654 –> 00:17:17.554
Over at How I Built It slash 4 0 4.
00:17:17.974 –> 00:17:22.324
You will get bonus points if you write in and tell me the little Easter egg
00:17:22.354 –> 00:17:24.904
I hit in the topic of this episode.
00:17:25.624 –> 00:17:32.974
Uh, now if you do join, the membership members will hear the extended
00:17:33.064 –> 00:17:36.634
version, the ad free extended version where I'm thinking about
00:17:36.634 –> 00:17:38.944
my podcast production toolkit.
00:17:39.319 –> 00:17:44.209
And I kind of think out loud about if it's time to ditch DS script, which has
00:17:44.209 –> 00:17:47.749
been an integral part of my process, but I have some reasons that I'll
00:17:47.749 –> 00:17:49.879
explore in the members only episode.
00:17:50.119 –> 00:17:51.319
Thanks so much for listening.
00:17:51.319 –> 00:17:56.689
Thanks to our sponsors, and until next time, get out there and build something.

