Should You Stop Teaching to Get Clients? [Friday Wrap-Up]

This week I talk about a Steve Thompson video that’s had me rethinking my whole approach — the idea that teaching tactics on YouTube actually costs you clients, because when you hand people the solution they assume they can do it themselves. After a rough summer where teaching hasn’t yielded new business, I’ve decided to make September an experimental month: teach less, shift beliefs more, and stop being afraid to sell. Then a story about three climbers rescued off Mount Shasta after relying on AI to plan their climb, and a recommendation for DJ Earworm mashups on YouTube. Plus this week’s systems tip: a video outliner I built with Claude Code that gives me the beats but never the words.

Links:

These episodes are about taking more time off, especially on the weekends. And the best way you can do that is by having a good system in place to stop you from doing everything yourself. If you’re not sure where to start, I’m offering free 25-minute coaching calls to listeners. You can book yours over at https://streamlined.fm/clarity.

Do you have something on your mind? Let me know at https://streamlinedfeedback.com. You can write in, or leave a voice note. I might even play it on the show.

View the episode transcript

0:00 Should You Stop Teaching to Get Clients?
5:37 Recommended Reading: When AI Nearly Killed Three Climbers
10:41 Something Fun: DJ Earworm Mashups
13:24 The Video Outliner That Keeps Me Honest

————
Streamlined Solopreneur helps overwhelmed solo business owners go from overwhelmed to having their time back.

Each week, Joe Casabona shares one practical idea — a system, tool, or strategy to help you get your time back without selling your soul to AI…and run your business without sacrificing the rest of your life, or your health.

Looking for a place to start? Take the Solo Systems Starter Quiz. 60 seconds, 8 questions, and I will tell you what system you should build first, and exactly how to build it. https://streamlined.fm/quiz 

Connect with Joe on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jcasabona/

Disclosure: these show notes were generated from the transcript and written newsletter, using a very strict format for how it’s all put together.

Transcript
1
00:00:00,00 –> 00:00:04,10
Hey everybody, and welcome to the Friday wrap up on Streamline Solopreneur,

2
00:00:03,980 –> 00:00:09,710
I'm your host, Joe Casabona, and here's what's on my mind for September 4th, 2026.

3
00:00:09,810 –> 00:00:14,680
Number one is teaching versus shifting beliefs.

4
00:00:14,780 –> 00:00:19,920
The thing that's been dominating my thoughts this week is a video from Steve Thompson

5
00:00:19,950 –> 00:00:25,110
called Don't Teach on YouTube. Do this instead to make your first a hundred thousand

6
00:00:25,110 –> 00:00:25,650
dollars.

7
00:00:25,750 –> 00:00:32,660
If I'm being honest, it's been a rough summer for the business. I've heard a chorus

8
00:00:32,660 –> 00:00:36,410
of, yeah, me too. And it sounds like it's the whole industry and

9
00:00:36,510 –> 00:00:39,160
it's nice that it's

10
00:00:39,260 –> 00:00:44,70
not just me or, or so it seems. But that doesn't solve my problem, and it kind of

11
00:00:44,70 –> 00:00:46,770
just makes me feel bad for everybody else as well.

12
00:00:46,870 –> 00:00:52,490
If you've been on my mailing list during the summer, you may have noticed that I've

13
00:00:52,490 –> 00:00:59,480
been experimenting more with content and with offers and with the format of the newsletter.

14
00:00:59,580 –> 00:01:04,630
But at the core of that has always been my belief

15
00:01:04,730 –> 00:01:07,740
that if I teach people how to do something,

16
00:01:07,840 –> 00:01:11,90
the ones who don't want to do it themselves will hire me.

17
00:01:11,190 –> 00:01:17,80
That belief has been greatly challenged this year, and Thompson basically says, why

18
00:01:17,80 –> 00:01:19,180
in this video that I'm sharing

19
00:01:19,280 –> 00:01:22,380
that if you give people the solution,

20
00:01:22,480 –> 00:01:24,830
they'll think they can do it themselves,

21
00:01:24,790 –> 00:01:26,150
But when they get stuck,

22
00:01:26,250 –> 00:01:30,280
they're not gonna get stuck during your business hours and you're not going to be

23
00:01:30,280 –> 00:01:31,750
there to help them.

24
00:01:31,850 –> 00:01:38,850
It's true that I've largely and often attracted a DIY crowd, but I've always hoped

25
00:01:39,180 –> 00:01:39,750
that

26
00:01:39,850 –> 00:01:46,280
in attracting the DIY crowd, I would also get people who didn't want to DIY.

27
00:01:46,380 –> 00:01:49,630
So I can't stop thinking about this

28
00:01:49,730 –> 00:01:52,290
for a couple of reasons, right? I, first of all, I

29
00:01:52,270 –> 00:01:53,190
love teaching.

30
00:01:53,190 –> 00:01:54,910
I've taught in the classroom,

31
00:01:55,10 –> 00:01:59,760
I've spoken many times, I've given workshops. I love teaching people,

32
00:01:59,860 –> 00:02:02,990
but teaching has not yielded new business this year.

33
00:02:03,90 –> 00:02:06,850
And that's been tough. And in fact, if I think back

34
00:02:06,950 –> 00:02:07,890
over

35
00:02:07,990 –> 00:02:11,600
the clients I got over the last year,

36
00:02:11,700 –> 00:02:14,830
they aren't people who came to me

37
00:02:14,930 –> 00:02:17,280
and found me via my teaching.

38
00:02:17,380 –> 00:02:23,570
They are people who googled the need for a podcast coach or a systems coach,

39
00:02:23,670 –> 00:02:26,230
or were referred to me by somebody.

40
00:02:26,330 –> 00:02:33,390
So not only has teaching not gotten me clients, but all of the clients I have gotten

41
00:02:33,390 –> 00:02:33,990
were not

42
00:02:34,90 –> 00:02:37,520
people who found, who saw me teaching and were like, yes, do it for me.

43
00:02:37,620 –> 00:02:43,930
So this really, I know anecdotal, but it really reinforces what Thompson is saying

44
00:02:43,930 –> 00:02:44,710
in this video

45
00:02:44,810 –> 00:02:49,50
that teaching is not the thing that actually gets you the clients.

46
00:02:49,150 –> 00:02:52,640
What, and what he says is, you need to shift someone's beliefs,

47
00:02:52,740 –> 00:02:56,200
and once you shift their beliefs, you become their guide.

48
00:02:56,300 –> 00:02:59,430
And I don't know if he, I forget if he uses the actual term guide, but that's the

49
00:02:59,430 –> 00:03:00,120
term I'm using.

50
00:03:00,220 –> 00:03:01,790
So that's a b

51
00:03:01,890 –> 00:03:03,400
is it seems

52
00:03:03,500 –> 00:03:09,330
completely counterintuitive to me to not make content that teaches something like,

53
00:03:09,360 –> 00:03:13,920
I, like when I watched slash listened to this video on my walk,

54
00:03:14,20 –> 00:03:14,540
I

55
00:03:14,640 –> 00:03:18,250
was confused. I was like, I, what would I,

56
00:03:18,350 –> 00:03:19,80
what

57
00:03:19,180 –> 00:03:21,770
content would I make

58
00:03:21,870 –> 00:03:27,70
that doesn't teach something? And I think I took this a little too literally.

59
00:03:27,170 –> 00:03:30,900
'cause he's not saying don't teach it all. Obviously, you need to teach the belief

60
00:03:30,900 –> 00:03:31,470
system.

61
00:03:31,570 –> 00:03:34,880
What he's saying is don't teach the tactics,

62
00:03:34,980 –> 00:03:38,290
right? Don't do a straight up tutorial on how to do something.

63
00:03:38,390 –> 00:03:42,210
And I'll talk more about this in the something to help your systems, but I've decided

64
00:03:42,210 –> 00:03:44,250
to make September an experimental month.

65
00:03:44,350 –> 00:03:49,220
I want to publish a few videos a weekly. I wanna keep up my weekly cadence

66
00:03:49,320 –> 00:03:51,640
in the format that Thompson recommends,

67
00:03:51,740 –> 00:03:53,400
where I stop teaching as much

68
00:03:53,500 –> 00:03:56,330
and I try to get more paid clients.

69
00:03:56,430 –> 00:04:02,470
Now, this also means big changes will be coming to my mailing list. If you're on

70
00:04:02,470 –> 00:04:04,60
my mailing list, you'll know that

71
00:04:04,160 –> 00:04:06,660
I had a short sale sequence this week.

72
00:04:06,760 –> 00:04:09,140
No one bought from that sale sequence.

73
00:04:09,240 –> 00:04:12,370
I've always been scared of selling too much.

74
00:04:12,470 –> 00:04:15,150
And halfway through this sequence,

75
00:04:15,250 –> 00:04:18,290
I decided I'm going to get rid of that fear.

76
00:04:18,390 –> 00:04:22,90
And I'm not really going, I wouldn't call it scorched earth, because there still

77
00:04:22,90 –> 00:04:23,800
needs to be value in the newsletter.

78
00:04:23,800 –> 00:04:27,50
but I have not been selling,

79
00:04:27,150 –> 00:04:29,680
and I need to get over that fear. My friend Kat,

80
00:04:29,780 –> 00:04:31,170
shout out, Kat, if you're listening,

81
00:04:31,270 –> 00:04:35,420
shared a response someone else had when they were getting complaints about selling

82
00:04:35,420 –> 00:04:36,110
to their list.

83
00:04:36,210 –> 00:04:40,150
And that response is, sorry that I'm trying to do my job.

84
00:04:40,250 –> 00:04:45,30
I like helping people. I really do. And I've always believed that if I just help

85
00:04:45,30 –> 00:04:50,280
people enough, they'll hire me. And that's not, that has not been true this year.

86
00:04:50,490 –> 00:04:53,670
It may not have been true for most of my career,

87
00:04:53,770 –> 00:04:57,890
and I've just been getting false positives because I've been helping people and getting

88
00:04:57,890 –> 00:04:58,580
clients.

89
00:04:58,680 –> 00:05:01,120
But that doesn't mean that one caused the other.

90
00:05:01,220 –> 00:05:04,770
And I'm realizing thanks to this video and some other things I've been thinking about

91
00:05:04,770 –> 00:05:11,730
this week, that the best way for me to help people is by getting paid to do it.

92
00:05:11,830 –> 00:05:16,40
And so I need to do everything I can to get paid to do it,

93
00:05:16,140 –> 00:05:20,380
at least for now. Maybe one day I'll become absurdly wealthy and I'll just teach

94
00:05:20,380 –> 00:05:20,770
for free.

95
00:05:20,870 –> 00:05:21,810
I would love that.

96
00:05:21,910 –> 00:05:26,630
But right now, I, I need to do what's best for my business and my family.

97
00:05:26,730 –> 00:05:30,370
Let me know what you think about this. Do you have something on your mind? Let me

98
00:05:30,370 –> 00:05:35,140
know over@streamlinedfeedback.com. You can write in or leave a voice note. I might

99
00:05:35,140 –> 00:05:37,510
even play it on the show.

100
00:05:37,610 –> 00:05:43,650
Alright, let's move on to recommended reading. This week. That recommended reading

101
00:05:43,650 –> 00:05:44,280
is

102
00:05:44,310 –> 00:05:52,240
three Mount Shasta Climbers rescued after relying on AI to plan climb. This is from

103
00:05:52,240 –> 00:06:00,760
K ctv.com, and I would file this under strong contestants for the Darwin Awards.

104
00:06:00,860 –> 00:06:07,110
I usually focus on the more cerebral dangers of ai. The idea that letting AI do the

105
00:06:07,110 –> 00:06:12,120
work for you will lead to brain rot. You'll lose the ability to think critically

106
00:06:12,450 –> 00:06:17,880
or articulate thoughts without first running to a large language model to tell you

107
00:06:17,880 –> 00:06:23,940
how you feel. And that is extremely problematic. It's the root of everything I talk

108
00:06:23,940 –> 00:06:25,920
about with conscientious AI usage.

109
00:06:26,20 –> 00:06:30,410
But this story shows that there is also a straight up

110
00:06:30,510 –> 00:06:32,410
physical danger.

111
00:06:32,510 –> 00:06:33,660
These people

112
00:06:33,760 –> 00:06:34,610
asked

113
00:06:34,710 –> 00:06:36,820
some large language model,

114
00:06:36,920 –> 00:06:39,00
how to plan their climb.

115
00:06:39,100 –> 00:06:41,390
And instead of,

116
00:06:41,490 –> 00:06:45,640
taking the recommendations and validating them

117
00:06:45,740 –> 00:06:48,00
against some expert,

118
00:06:48,100 –> 00:06:48,890
or

119
00:06:48,990 –> 00:06:50,440
maybe just talking

120
00:06:50,540 –> 00:06:51,600
to an expert,

121
00:06:51,700 –> 00:06:53,420
they decided to just take

122
00:06:53,520 –> 00:06:55,840
what it said verbatim.

123
00:06:55,940 –> 00:07:02,40
the best part of it is the quotes at the bottom. So here's exactly from the article.

124
00:07:02,40 –> 00:07:02,640
I'm gonna quote.

125
00:07:02,740 –> 00:07:08,270
the group said it packed supplies for an eight hour climb, not its roughly 16 hour

126
00:07:08,270 –> 00:07:08,810
ascent.

127
00:07:08,910 –> 00:07:14,320
The climber said, AI recommended simple carbohydrates instead of fats because fats

128
00:07:14,350 –> 00:07:17,140
take too long to digest.

129
00:07:17,240 –> 00:07:24,210
And then they said, we relied too much on AI rather than our own critical thinking.

130
00:07:24,690 –> 00:07:26,490
The group told rangers,

131
00:07:26,590 –> 00:07:29,90
the article, just so you know, the article

132
00:07:29,190 –> 00:07:34,510
says, official said climbers should use reliable sources, carry paper maps and other

133
00:07:34,510 –> 00:07:38,740
backup navigation tools, set a turnaround time and follow it.

134
00:07:38,840 –> 00:07:42,960
They also urged climbers to bring enough food, water, warm clothes, and emergency

135
00:07:42,960 –> 00:07:46,410
supplies for a long day. And an unexpected night

136
00:07:46,510 –> 00:07:49,520
on the mountain. I can only imagine what the prompt was like,

137
00:07:49,620 –> 00:07:50,740
Hey, we're,

138
00:07:50,840 –> 00:07:54,780
you know, we're gonna do a hike. We expect it to be eight hours. What should we bring?

139
00:07:54,880 –> 00:07:56,810
and so like, I, I know nothing about hiking.

140
00:07:56,910 –> 00:07:59,770
And so what I would do in this situation is ask my brother,

141
00:07:59,870 –> 00:08:01,680
or my brother-in-law, both of whom

142
00:08:01,780 –> 00:08:03,230
hike regularly,

143
00:08:03,330 –> 00:08:06,460
my brother would probably be a little more mean about it, or maybe a little more

144
00:08:06,460 –> 00:08:08,320
direct and be like, I don't know if you could do an eight hour hike.

145
00:08:08,420 –> 00:08:13,980
so we rely too much on AI rather than our own. Critical thinking is, I think, an

146
00:08:13,980 –> 00:08:15,300
incredible understatement.

147
00:08:15,400 –> 00:08:20,300
It's an even stronger argument that AI is a word calculator that doesn't quote unquote

148
00:08:20,300 –> 00:08:20,990
know

149
00:08:21,90 –> 00:08:21,880
anything.

150
00:08:21,980 –> 00:08:22,620
And,

151
00:08:22,720 –> 00:08:29,210
possibly because of this story this week, I also came across the AI mushroom meme.

152
00:08:29,330 –> 00:08:34,490
I, this is, I think this was going around in July, but it's basically a person holding

153
00:08:34,490 –> 00:08:35,240
up a mushroom,

154
00:08:35,340 –> 00:08:40,120
to an AI avatar and saying like, Hey, can I eat this? And it's like, yes, absolutely

155
00:08:40,120 –> 00:08:40,570
you can.

156
00:08:40,670 –> 00:08:42,170
Uh, and then the next panel is, uh,

157
00:08:42,100 –> 00:08:45,710
a gravestone and it says, you're absolutely right, that mushroom was poisonous. Would

158
00:08:45,710 –> 00:08:47,660
you like to learn more about poisonous mushrooms?

159
00:08:47,760 –> 00:08:48,280
So,

160
00:08:48,380 –> 00:08:53,720
I came across that meme this week and an article arguing that the meme is propaganda

161
00:08:53,720 –> 00:08:56,840
stating that AI must never be wrong.

162
00:08:56,940 –> 00:09:01,90
Uh, I think the article felt a little ramly at times, like it mentioned, like childhood

163
00:09:01,90 –> 00:09:02,470
vaccines at some point.

164
00:09:02,570 –> 00:09:09,30
and this author who I am going to bestow the dubious honor of being AI blue pilled

165
00:09:09,240 –> 00:09:09,660
on,

166
00:09:09,760 –> 00:09:15,970
uh, misses the point of the meme. The meme is not that AI must always be wrong.

167
00:09:15,970 –> 00:09:20,70
The point of the meme is that we shouldn't blindly trust ai.

168
00:09:20,170 –> 00:09:24,770
So what should these people have done? Well, I kind of mentioned it already, use

169
00:09:24,770 –> 00:09:29,960
actual trustworthy sources and people with experience would be number one.

170
00:09:30,60 –> 00:09:32,680
But if you are going to turn to ai,

171
00:09:32,780 –> 00:09:35,670
use it to surface trustworthy sources,

172
00:09:36,00 –> 00:09:38,770
You say, I am thinking about doing this.

173
00:09:38,870 –> 00:09:39,720
Can you

174
00:09:39,820 –> 00:09:41,30
surface

175
00:09:41,130 –> 00:09:44,440
advice and cite primary sources

176
00:09:44,540 –> 00:09:47,40
for the, for what I should do? Right?

177
00:09:47,140 –> 00:09:50,150
And then you can go and vet and, you know, maybe something from,

178
00:09:50,250 –> 00:09:55,420
you know, the, the National Park Service is going to be better than some rando on

179
00:09:55,420 –> 00:09:55,810
Reddit.

180
00:09:55,910 –> 00:10:00,450
So AI is a fast moving field. We, we need AI literacy.

181
00:10:00,550 –> 00:10:02,420
It's going to be hard to figure out,

182
00:10:02,520 –> 00:10:09,160
you know, what, what AI literacy today is versus a year from now. But using AI is

183
00:10:09,160 –> 00:10:14,380
axiomatic of using or reading pretty much anything on the internet. It's the same

184
00:10:14,380 –> 00:10:20,530
lesson that we learned from blogs and social media that just because it's printed

185
00:10:20,530 –> 00:10:24,100
on the screen does not make it true.

186
00:10:24,200 –> 00:10:26,210
we need better, we need to do better,

187
00:10:26,310 –> 00:10:29,560
uh, because these people very well could have died

188
00:10:29,660 –> 00:10:32,310
because they took advice from AI

189
00:10:32,410 –> 00:10:33,980
instead of some trustworthy source.

190
00:10:34,220 –> 00:10:36,680
Man, what a, what a weird way to go

191
00:10:36,680 –> 00:10:38,550
to go from this to something fun.

192
00:10:38,650 –> 00:10:41,420
but that's, that's the format I'm sticking with.

193
00:10:41,520 –> 00:10:45,760
this something fun is DJ Earworm mashups.

194
00:10:45,860 –> 00:10:52,50
I've been listening to their mashups for over 15 years now, and this week I rediscovered

195
00:10:52,50 –> 00:10:54,270
some of my favorites, including the one,

196
00:10:54,370 –> 00:10:59,870
uh, I'm linking in the show notes party on the floor from summer 2011.

197
00:10:59,970 –> 00:11:05,890
they have such a unique approach to creating mashups and accompanying and, and the

198
00:11:05,890 –> 00:11:06,970
accompanying videos,

199
00:11:07,70 –> 00:11:09,500
which are really good, and I love them,

200
00:11:09,600 –> 00:11:15,690
as someone in his forties, the newer mashups also let me know what songs are popular

201
00:11:15,790 –> 00:11:21,500
these days. So recommend DJ Earworm. Have a, listen. There's a lot of really good

202
00:11:21,500 –> 00:11:23,930
stuff on their channel.

203
00:11:24,30 –> 00:11:27,970
Okay, let's round out with something to help your systems.

204
00:11:28,70 –> 00:11:31,440
I'm calling this the video outliner. So,

205
00:11:31,540 –> 00:11:33,320
related to,

206
00:11:33,420 –> 00:11:37,390
the on my Mind segment, I decided if I was gonna try Steve Thompson's approach to

207
00:11:37,390 –> 00:11:43,360
YouTube, I needed something that would keep me honest using Claude code. I built

208
00:11:43,360 –> 00:11:46,900
a video outliner in H-T-M-L-C-S-S and JavaScript.

209
00:11:46,900 –> 00:11:50,780
So if you wanna see a screenshot of this, I do include it in my newsletter.

210
00:11:50,880 –> 00:11:55,480
I, I can also show it on screen on the YouTube video or the video, I guess, depending

211
00:11:55,480 –> 00:11:56,950
on where you're listening slash watching.

212
00:11:57,50 –> 00:12:03,300
so I took several of Thompson's videos, videos that I watched, not just videos I

213
00:12:03,300 –> 00:12:04,440
blindly agreed with,

214
00:12:04,540 –> 00:12:06,770
uh, or blindly agreed with the analysis of.

215
00:12:06,870 –> 00:12:12,220
Uh, and I fed them into Claude asking it to review the common themes and format.

216
00:12:12,320 –> 00:12:19,290
It identified an arc with clearly labeled sections, and then Thompson's common answers

217
00:12:19,320 –> 00:12:26,580
to those sections. So like, who's the enemy and what is the advice of the enemy once

218
00:12:26,580 –> 00:12:30,750
the symptom, that sort of thing. So I took that, I made a table and I filled in my

219
00:12:30,760 –> 00:12:34,690
equivalent, which also live on a sticky post-it note on my wall.

220
00:12:34,790 –> 00:12:41,790
but I, I filled in this table and then I gave all of that analysis my table and the,

221
00:12:41,890 –> 00:12:46,700
format I like for creating videos, which is story, problem, solution, call to action.

222
00:12:46,800 –> 00:12:52,600
and I had Claude build a Mad Libs style page for me, which again, you can see as

223
00:12:52,600 –> 00:12:54,250
a screenshot in the show notes,

224
00:12:54,350 –> 00:13:00,240
or up on the screen in, in the video if you decide to watch the video.

225
00:13:00,340 –> 00:13:02,990
Uh, but again, I'll include a screenshot in the, in the show notes as well.

226
00:13:03,90 –> 00:13:05,140
The very crucial part here

227
00:13:05,240 –> 00:13:12,00
is that this gives me the beats, but never the words. I write the entire outline

228
00:13:12,00 –> 00:13:17,250
slash script using this format. And the reason that I decided to do it this way

229
00:13:17,350 –> 00:13:23,600
is because as I mentioned earlier, this is so different from my normal approach to

230
00:13:23,600 –> 00:13:29,270
creating videos that I wanted to make sure I was actually sticking to this format.

231
00:13:29,750 –> 00:13:30,590
And I think like

232
00:13:30,690 –> 00:13:33,820
using a large language model to build something

233
00:13:33,920 –> 00:13:38,610
around these guardrails is, is a very good use of it, right? It's doing the task

234
00:13:38,710 –> 00:13:43,460
and not the craft. I am still doing the craft, and I'm just following the requirements

235
00:13:43,580 –> 00:13:44,900
I've set forth for myself.

236
00:13:45,00 –> 00:13:47,500
An important part of

237
00:13:47,600 –> 00:13:48,930
this experiment

238
00:13:49,30 –> 00:13:50,750
is consistency,

239
00:13:50,850 –> 00:13:57,790
and this little application will help me stay consistent.

240
00:13:57,890 –> 00:14:05,10
So that's it for this episode. These episodes are about taking more time off, especially

241
00:14:05,10 –> 00:14:09,510
on the weekends. And the best way you can do that is by having a good system in place

242
00:14:09,900 –> 00:14:15,330
to stop you from doing everything yourself. Now, if you are not sure where to start,

243
00:14:15,330 –> 00:14:21,360
I am offering free 25 minute coaching calls to listeners. This will be one place

244
00:14:21,360 –> 00:14:23,550
where I actually do teach a little bit.

245
00:14:23,650 –> 00:14:31,760
You can book yours over at streamlined FM slash clarity, streamlined FM slash clarity.

246
00:14:32,120 –> 00:14:37,10
Thanks so much for listening to the Friday wrap up on Streamline Solopreneur. And

247
00:14:37,10 –> 00:14:41,00
until next time, I hope you find some space in your weekend.

Join the Discussion